You are designing a SharePoint 2010 feature that will be included in a solution package. You have added a feature receiver to your feature. You need to ensure that the code in the feature receiver executes when the solution package is deployed to the Web front-end servers. Which approach should you recommend?

• A. Add a Feature Activated node referencing the feature receiver assembly to the solution manifest file.
• B. Add your code to the Feature Installed method of the feature receiver.
• C. Add your code to the Feature Activated method of the feature receiver.
• D. Add a Feature Installed node referencing the feature receiver assembly to the solution manifest file.

You work for a software company that sells Web Parts to customers. You designed the first version of a Web Part named Weather 1.0. The company has already sold several hundred licenses of the Web Part. You designed a new solution package for Weather 2.0. Some customers who are already using Weather 1.0 will install Weather
2.0 in the same Web application as Weather 1.0. You need to design your package so that the functionality of Weather 1.0 will not be affected by the installation of Weather 2.0 in the same Web application. Which approach should you recommend?

• A. Use the same assembly name and namespace, but increment the version number of the assembly package. Configure assembly binding redirection from version 1.0 of the assembly to version 2.0. Use the same . web part file that you used for Weather 1.0.
• B. Use the same assembly name and namespace, but increment the version number of the assembly package. Use the same .web part file that you used for Weather 1.0.
• C. Use the same assembly name and namespace, but increment the version number of the assembly package. Create a new .web part file.
• D. Use the same assembly name and namespace for Weather 2.0 that you used for Weather 1.0. Create a new .web part file. Increment the version number in the .web part file.

You are designing a SharePoint 2010 intranet site for your company. Your design needs to meet the
following
requirements:
*A SharePoint feature (feature A) must make a custom list definition available for the entire site collection.
.Another SharePoint feature (feature B) must provision an instance of that custom list definition in the
particular
site where the feature is activated.
Which approach should you recommend?

• A. Set the scope of feature A to Site and the scope of feature B to Web. Add feature B to the set of Activation Dependencies in feature A.
• B. Set the scope of feature A to Web and the scope of feature B to Site. Add feature A to the set of Activation Dependencies in feature B.
• C. Set the scope of feature A to Web and the scope of feature B to Site. Add feature B to the set of Activation Dependencies in feature A.
• D. Set the scope of feature A to Site and the scope of feature B to Web. Add feature A to the set of Activation Dependencies in feature B.

You are designing several new custom applications for a SharePoint 2010 farm. One of the current applications contains a Web Part with code that requires substantial CPU and memory resources. The SharePoint farm administrator wants to ensure that new applications containing custom code do not degrade the performance of the Web front-end (WFE) servers when they are deployed to the SharePoint farm. You need to enable the administrator to perform the following tasks: *To configure the applications to run in isolation mode .To control the resource usage of custom SharePoint applications by assigning the execution load to specified servers and perform load-balancing of the WFE servers .To limit the resources allotted to specific applications without impacting overall farm performance and stability Your design must meet all these requirements. Which approach should you recommend?

• A. Design sandboxed solutions to deploy on the SharePoint 2010 farm. Specify that the execution of user code is to run on any available WFE server that is running the User Code Service.
• B. Design user controls, load them into Web Parts, and deploy them as features in the farm. Ensure that the SharePoint administrator will deactivate these features in the farm if WFE servers are running at or near 100% CPU utilization.
• C. Design sandboxed solutions to deploy on the SharePoint 2010 farm. Specify that the execution of user code is to run on the same WFE server as the server that received the Web request.
• D. Design farm-scoped solutions and deploy them in the farm. Ensure that the SharePoint administrator will uninstall solutions if WFE servers are running at or near 100% CPU utilization.

In your development environment, you designed new versions of a number of features currently working in
a
SharePoint 2010 farm. The features are being used throughout the farm at all scope levels. You need to
meet the
following requirements:
*All the features on the farm must be upgraded to the newest version.
.All existing feature instances must be upgraded to the latest version.
.The sites using the features must experience as little downtime as possible.
Which approach should you recommend?

• A. Specify the new version number and any upgrade actions required in each of the Feature.xml files. Run Feature upgrade as a solution package on the farm.
• B. Deploy each of the features in its own solution package to the farm. Specify the new version number for each feature in the current Feature.xml file for the feature. Activate the new features only in the locations where they are currently activated.
• C. Retract the existing versions of the features. Specify the new version number for each feature in a new Feature.xml file for each feature. Deploy the features as a new solution package. Activate the new features only in the locations where they are currently activated.
• D. Deploy all of the features as one solution package to the farm. Specify the new version number for each feature in the current Feature.xml file for the feature. Activate all of the new features at the farm level.